Pedagogical Exemplars for Mathematics Across Learning Styles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v4i2.415Keywords:
pedagogical exemplars, learning styles, mathematics, multimedia instruction, interactive media approachAbstract
This study investigated the effectiveness of different pedagogical exemplars for teaching mathematics across various learning styles using multimedia technology. The study utilized a quasi-experimental design. The experimental group received the intervention through an interactive computer presentation program, while the control group used the standard dialogue and discussion techniques. The study used survey questionnaires adapted from BARSCH's Learning Style Inventory and self-made pre-and post-tests to measure students' learning and engagement. The research findings revealed that students with different learning styles benefited differently from multimedia-assisted instruction, suggesting the importance of considering individual differences in instructional design. The use of multimedia technology in teaching mathematics facilitates the learning process of students with different learning styles. The results of this study also support the importance of using statistical analysis to evaluate the effectiveness of educational interventions and to inform evidence-based decision-making in education. This study identified the most effective pedagogical exemplars for each learning style and highlighted the benefits of interactive media teaching mathematics. These findings suggest that teaching methods that align with students' learning styles can improve academic performance
Downloads
Metrics
References
Alam, A. (2020). Pedagogy of Calculus in India: An Emperical Investigation. Periódico Tchê Química, 17(34), 164–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52571/PTQ.v17.n34.2020.181_P34_pgs_164_180.pdf
Alshurafat, H., Beattie, C., Jones, G., & Sands, J. (2020). Perceptions of the usefulness of various teaching methods in forensic accounting education. Accounting Education, 29(2), 177–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1719425 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09639284.2020.1719425
Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Irvine, C. K. S., & Walker, D. (2018). Introduction to Research in Education. Cengage Learning.
Batubara, I. H. (2019). Improving Student’s Critical Thinking Ability Through Guided Discovery Learning Methods Assisted by Geogebra. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Studies, 1(2), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1371 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29103/ijevs.v1i2.1371
Bobyliev, D. Y., & Vihrova, E. V. (2021). Problems and Prospects of Distance Learning in Teaching Fundamental Subjects to Future Mathematics Teachers. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1840(1), 012002. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1840/1/012002
Burbules, N. C., Fan, G., & Repp, P. (2020). Five Trends of Education and Technology in A Sustainable Future. Geography and Sustainability, 1(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.001
Capinding, A. T. (2021). Mathematics learning of high school students and the determinants of their performance in the midst of pandemic. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 12(12), 2995-3014.
Cardino Jr, J. M., & Cruz, R. A. O. D. (2020). Understanding of learning styles and teaching strategies towards improving the teaching and learning of mathematics. LUMAT: International Journal on Math, Science and Technology Education, 8(1), 19-43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.8.1.1348
Cevikbas, M., & Kaiser, G. (2020). Flipped Classroom as A Reform-Oriented Approach to Teaching Mathematics. ZDM, 52(7), 1291–1305. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01191-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01191-5
Cockett, A., & Kilgour, P. W. (2015). Mathematical Manipulatives: Creating an Environment for Understanding, Efficiency, Engagement, and Enjoyment. Teach Collection of Christian Education, 1(1), 5.
Comarú, M. W., Lopes, R. M., Braga, L. A. M., Batista Mota, F., & Galvão, C. (2021). A Bibliometric and Descriptive Analysis of Inclusive Education in Science Education. Studies in Science Education, 57(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1897930 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2021.1897930
Dahal, N., Pant, B. P., Shrestha, I. M., & Manandhar, N. K. (2022). Use of GeoGebra in Teaching and Learning Geometric Transformation in School Mathematics. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 16(8), 65-78. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v16i08.29575
Delgado-Rebolledo, R., & Zakaryan, D. (2020). Relationships Between the Knowledge of Practices in Mathematics and the Pedagogical Content Knowledge of a Mathematics Lecturer. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(3), 567–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09977-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09977-0
Donevska-Todorova, A., Trgalová, J., Schreiber, C., & Rojano, T. (2021). Quality of Task Design in Technology-Enhanced Resources for Teaching and Learning Mathematics. In Mathematics Education in the Digital Age, 23-41. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003137580-3
El-Emadi, A. A., Said, Z., & Friesen, H. L. (2019). Teaching Style Differences between Male and Female Science Teachers in Qatari Schools: Possible Impact on Student Achievement. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(12), em1800, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109236 DOI: https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/109236
Ferreira, M., Martinsone, B., & Talić, S. (2020). Promoting Sustainable Social Emotional Learning at School through Relationship-Centered Learning Environment, Teaching Methods and Formative Assessment. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 22(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/jtes-2020-0003
Furner, J. M., & Worrell, N. L. (2017). The Importance of Using Manipulatives in Teaching Math Today. Transformations, 3(1), 2.
Gates, P. (2018). The Importance of Diagrams, Graphics and Other Visual Representations in STEM Teaching. STEM Education in the Junior Secondary: The State of Play, 169-196. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5448-8_9
Hasumi, T., & Chiu, M.-S. (2022). Online Mathematics Education as Bio-Eco-Techno Process: Bibliometric Analysis Using Co-Authorship and Bibliographic Coupling. Scientometrics, 127(8), 4631–4654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04441-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04441-3
Iqbal, M. Z., Mangina, E., & Campbell, A. G. (2019, October). Exploring the Use of Augmented Reality in A Kinesthetic Learning Application Integrated with An Intelligent Virtual Embodied Agent. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct), 12-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR-Adjunct.2019.00018
Jurado de los Santos, P., Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Marín-Marín, J.-A., & Soler Costa, R. (2020). The Term Equity in Education: A Literature Review with Scientific Mapping in Web of Science. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(10), 3526. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103526 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17103526
Kärchner, H., Trautner, M., Willeke, S., & Schwinger, M. (2022). How Handheld Use is Connected to Learning-Related Factors and Academic Achievement: Meta-Analysis and Research Synthesis. Computers and Education Open, 3, 100116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100116 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2022.100116
Kubilinskiene, S. (2020). On Linking Project-Based Learning Activities And Students’ Learning Styles In Personalised Learning. INTED2020 Proceedings, 853–862. https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.0304 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21125/inted.2020.0304
Lim, T., Lee, S., & Ke, F. (2018). Integrating music into math in a virtual reality game: learning fractions. In Virtual and Augmented Reality: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, 1122-1141. IGI Global. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-5469-1.ch053
Mandinach, E. B., & Schildkamp, K. (2021). Misconceptions About Data-Based Decision Making in Education: An Exploration of the Literature. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 69, 100842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100842
Milligan, L. O., Koornhof, H., Sapire, I., & Tikly, L. (2018). Understanding the Role of Learning and Teaching Support Materials in Enabling Learning for All. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 49(4), 529-547. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1431107 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2018.1431107
Mobo, F. D., Siahaan, S., Saadoon, A., & Ranjan, R. (2022). Involvement of Faculty in Research and Community Extension. Mamangan: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 1-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22202/mamangan.v12i1.6447
Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Aznar-Díaz, I., Cáceres-Reche, P., & Alonso-García, S. (2020). E-Learning in the Teaching of Mathematics: An Educational Experience in Adult High School. Mathematics, 8(5), 840, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050840 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/math8050840
Nind, M. (2020). A New Application for the Concept of Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Teaching Advanced Social Science Research Methods. Oxford Review of Education, 46(2), 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1644996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2019.1644996
Partovi, T., & Razavi, M. R. (2019). The Effect of Game-Based Learning on Academic Achievement Motivation of Elementary School Students. Learning and Motivation, 68, 101592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2019.101592 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lmot.2019.101592
Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning Styles: Concepts and Evidence. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 9(3), 105-119. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6053.2009.01038.x
Philominraj, A., Jeyabalan, D., & Vidal-Silva, C. (2017). Visual Learning: A Learner Centered Approach to Enhance English Language Teaching. English Language Teaching, 10(3), 54-62. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v10n3p54
Pires, A. C., Bakala, E., González-Perilli, F., Sansone, G., Fleischer, B., Marichal, S., & Guerreiro, T. (2022). Learning Maths with A Tangible User Interface: Lessons Learned Through Participatory Design with Children with Visual Impairments and Their Educators. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction, 32, 100382. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcci.2021.100382
Popovska Nalevska, G., & Kuzmanovska, M. (2020). Teaching Methods as A Factor of Students'learning Motivation. Education, 2(3-4), 40-50.
Quigley, M. T. (2021). Concrete Materials in Primary Classrooms: Teachers' Beliefs and Practices about How and Why They Are Used. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 23(2), 59-78.
Rahman, N. A., Rosli, R., Rambely, A. S., & Halim, L. (2021). Mathematics Teachers’ Practices of STEM Education: A Systematic Literature Review. European Journal of Educational Research, 10(3), 1541–1559. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.10.3.1541
Sáez-López, J.-M., Sevillano-García, M.-L., & Vazquez-Cano, E. (2019). The Effect of Programming on Primary School Students’ Mathematical and Scientific Understanding: Educational Use of mBot. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(6), 1405–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09648-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-019-09648-5
Serdyukov, P. (2017). Innovation in Education: What Works, What Doesn’t, and What to do About it?. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 10(1), 4–33. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIT-10-2016-0007
Sheridan, K. M., Banzer, D., Pradzinski, A., & Wen, X. (2020). Early Math Professional Development: Meeting the Challenge Through Online Learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(2), 223-231. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00992-y
Skilling, K., & Stylianides, G. J. (2020). Using Vignettes in Educational Research: A Framework for Vignette Construction. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 43(5), 541–556. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1704243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2019.1704243
Soares, N., Evans, T., & Patel, D. R. (2018). Specific Learning Disability in Mathematics: A Comprehensive Review. Translational Pediatrics, 7(1), 48. https://doi.org/10.21037%2Ftp.2017.08.03 DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/tp.2017.08.03
Troussas, C., Krouska, A., Sgouropoulou, C., & Voyiatzis, I. (2020). Ensemble Learning Using Fuzzy Weights to Improve Learning Style Identification for Adapted Instructional Routines. Entropy, 22(7), 735, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.3390/e22070735 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/e22070735
Truong, H. M. (2016). Integrating Learning Styles and Adaptive E-Learning System: Current Developments, Problems and Opportunities. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 1185–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.02.014
Veeck, G., Veeck, A., & Yu, H. (2020). Challenges of agriculture and food systems issues in China and the United States. Geography and Sustainability, 1(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geosus.2020.05.002
WASİK, S., Barrow, J., Royal, C., Brooks, R., Dames, L., Corry, L., & Corbin, B. İ. R. D. (2019). Online Counselor Education: Creative Approaches And Best Practices In Online Learning Environments. Research on Education and Psychology, 3(1), 43-52.
Willingham, D. (2017). Ask the Cognitive Scientist: Do Manipulatives Help Students Learn. American Educator, 41(3), 25-30.
Willingham, D. T. (2018). Ask the Cognitive Scientist: Does Tailoring Instruction to" Learning Styles" Help Students Learn?. American Educator, 42(2), 28.
Yang, X., Kaiser, G., König, J., & Blömeke, S. (2020). Relationship Between Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Knowledge, Beliefs and Instructional Practices in China. ZDM, 52(2), 281–294. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01145-x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01145-x
Yu, M., Cui, J., Wang, L., Gao, X., Cui, Z., & Zhou, X. (2022). Spatial Processing Rather Than Logical Reasoning was Found to be Critical for Mathematical Problem-Solving. Learning and Individual Differences, 100, 102230, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102230 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102230
Zhong, B., & Xia, L. (2020). A Systematic Review on Exploring the Potential of Educational Robotics in Mathematics Education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18(1), 79–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-09939-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-018-09939-y
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Evelina N. Ocampo, Kevin William Andri Siahaan, Samuel Juliardi Sinaga, Anesito L. Cutillas
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.