The Effect of Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) Model on Students’ Achievement in Elementary School

Arief Aulia Rahman; Zulkifli Zulkifli; Ilham Kamaruddin; Devi Syukri Azhari; Agus Supriyadi

doi:10.51276/edu.v4i1.282

Authors

Arief Aulia Rahman Universitas Muhammadiyah Sumatera Utara https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6125-0738
Zulkifli Zulkifli Sekolah Tinggi Teknologi Bontang
Ilham Kamaruddin Universitas Negeri Makassar
Devi Syukri Azhari UPI YPTK Padang
Agus Supriyadi Universitas Khairun

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.51276/edu.v4i1.282

Keywords:

Achievement, Contextual Teaching and Learning, Learning Outcomes

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of the CTL model on the learning outcomes of fifth-grade students at SD Negeri Peunaga Cut Ujong and to find out how much influence the CTL model has on the learning outcomes of fifth-grade students at SD Negeri Peunaga. Cut Ujong. The approach in this study uses a quantitative approach. This type of research uses a pre-experimental design. The population in this study were the fifth-grade students of SD Negeri Peunaga Cut Ujong, as many as 26 students. The sampling technique used in this research is intact-group comparison. The sample in this study was 13 students in the experimental class and as many as 13 students in the control class. The data collection techniques used in this study were observation, tests, and documentation. This study's instruments used to collect data consisted of observation sheets, test sheets, and validation sheets. The results of this study are from the analysis obtained tcount = 0.965 > ttable = 0.05, it is concluded that the hypothesis is accepted, the conclusion is that there is a difference or influence of the CTL model on student learning outcomes between students who are taught using the CTL with students who are taught by not using CTL model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afni, N. (2020, July). Contextual teaching and learning (CTL) as a strategy to improve students mathematical literacy. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1581, No. 1, p. 012043). IOP Publishing.

Baron, P. (2016). A cybernetic approach to contextual teaching and learning. Constructivist Foundations, 12(1), 91-100.

Beck, U. (2014). The brave new world of work. John Wiley & Sons.

Bowen, J. (2013). A History of Western Education: The Modern West Europe and the New World. Routledge.

Dewi, P. Y. A., & Primayana, K. H. (2019). Effect of learning module with setting contextual teaching and learning to increase the understanding of concepts. International Journal of Education and Learning, 1(1), 19-26.

Goodman, K. S., & Goodman, Y. M. (2013). Learning to read ls natural. Theory and practice of early reading, 1, 137.

Hénard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices. An IMHE Guide for Higher Education Institutions, 1(1), 7-11.

Hendawati, Y., Pratomo, S., Suhaedah, S., Lestari, N. A., Ridwan, T., & Majid, N. W. A. (2019, October). Contextual teaching and learning of physics at elementary school. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1318, No. 1, p. 012130). IOP Publishing.

Hwang, G. J., Lai, C. L., & Wang, S. Y. (2015). Seamless flipped learning: a mobile technology-enhanced flipped classroom with effective learning strategies. Journal of computers in education, 2(4), 449-473.

Lotulung, C. F., Ibrahim, N., & Tumurang, H. (2018). Effectiveness of Learning Method Contextual Teaching Learning (CTL) for Increasing Learning Outcomes of Entrepreneurship Education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(3), 37-46.

Manurung, I. D., & Sari, D. P. (2022, February). HOTS (Higher Order Thinking Skills) in English Reading Exercises Textbook. In Proceeding International Conference On Language, Literature And Culture (Vol. 1, p. 391). umsu press.

Nuraini, N., Riadi, A., Umanailo, M. C. B., Rusdi, M., Badu, T. K., Suryani, S., ... & Hentihu, V. R. (2019). Political Policy for the development of Education. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 8(10).

Oktavia, L P. (2022, February). Learning Development Model Discovery Learning Motivation To Improve Education Student Writing Indonesian FKIP UMSU. In Proceeding International Conference On Language, Literature And Culture (Vol. 1, p. 235). umsu press.

Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons, 59(3), 311-320.

Roehl, A., Reddy, S. L., & Shannon, G. J. (2013). The flipped classroom: An opportunity to engage millennial students through active learning strategies. Journal of Family & Consumer Sciences, 105(2), 44-49.

Selvianiresa, D., & Prabawanto, S. (2017, September). Contextual teaching and learning approach of mathematics in primary schools. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 895, No. 1, p. 012171). IOP Publishing.

Tamur, M., Jehadus, E., Nendi, F., Mandur, K., & Murni, V. (2020, October). Assessing the effectiveness of the contextual teaching and learning model on students’ mathematical understanding ability: a meta-analysis study. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1657, No. 1, p. 012067). IOP Publishing.

Ültay, N., & Çalık, M. (2012). A thematic review of studies into the effectiveness of context-based chemistry curricula. Journal of science education and technology, 21(6), 686-701.